"What we fly ..." - Documentary Movies

"What we fly ..." | Rating: 4.8!

Documentary Movies

"Where do we fly?" - Such questions are asked correspondent Igor Yegorov. Together with eminent aviators, he tried to find the answer in the 9-minute coverage. Very interesting story, full of relevant views of the current state of Russian Aviation

→ Size: 49 MB

→ Date: 17 years ago (21.10.2008 17:48)

→ Author: "3-й КАНАЛ" (эфир от 18.10.08)

→ Uploaded by: Badry (uploaded 5 files )

→ Approved by moderator: AirArt

→ License: Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution

→ Downloaded: 2292 time(s)

Watch Online Comments 19 View ZIP-Content Download

Pipets ... All on foot to walk :)))))) − evolved, 17 years ago, #

Magomed Tolboev rights to 99%. One per cent is just about the new aircraft. Suppose a couple dozen new B and A, our a / to buy, but it does not save the situation. The rest - it is mostly stuff that has passed through the hands of a few foreign companies, resell spend over the country, either aviahranilisch, under the guise of the past CWR. 747-200 TCO seen? And who can say exactly Skoki this device prostoyal in the American wilderness aposlya N-tion of number of flight hours, until we bought? Karim, the year still have no say. As correctly observed by MT for the year could be the latest and gelding razdolbat. Fallen in Perm 735 1992g.v. New? It seems like, not old. But for his flight, he changed the lives of at least 5 A / K (do not remember exactly, was discussed at avia.ru). Who has seen its present form? Who knows its current strike and the number of landings? With all this, it is possible, of course, buy only the latest technology from the west, but then our factories and so on will be to produce one aircraft a year (at best), because demand creates supply. No jobs - no production. Wiring foreign technology to the Russian market makes someone nehily percentage, but buries the domestic aircraft. Here in all this is the main zvizdets ... − ru_19_300, 17 years ago, #

You are right .... but still there are many examples in the form of LOT, CSA, MALEV, where Boeing is also not new and are not purchased directly from the U.S. will, and everything is fine .... As correctly said Raphael Aptukov about 97% of catastrophic human factor when valilis Carcases reporters wrote that it was time to write all this scourge of Russian aviation. Boeing fell 1 single is now a ban on all foreign armed forces, hence the conclusion that maloponimayuschee and nahvatshiesya tops of the media tried to make another interesting transfer .... truth is she is home! − Carim, 17 years ago, #

90% clip - idiocy, no new aircraft .... and AFL and S7? Prohibit the importation of foreign cars, let's disable .... ... then do not fly at what could be .... well, at the 4-TU-204 released a year from the plant, and the delusion about the 30-year aircraft .. .. yes, maybe Tu-154 and IL-86-30 and summer, but not Boeing, a maximum of 1988-2005th year .... and in general are tired of this primitive way of thinking about old airplanes cause disaster .... If According to commission pilot KD-Avia purely and simply forgot to release the landing gear then what's technology??? Pi * dets .... big movie about anything! − Carim, 17 years ago, #

Fly airline Armavia) all the "watermelons" gone konveyrea in Hamburg − Nonius, 16 years ago, #

Yeah, but sochah broke ... − Epsilon63, 16 years ago, #

Sochi 1 total crashes − Nonius, 16 years ago, #

And in Brussels burned ... − Exelletor, 16 years ago, #

her a lift ((I am in shock. planes are the same machine, one of you that buy our 10-ku (sorry for netsenzurschinu) or folts.sam work at 747, before that worked in our Technology (TU-214, IL -62, etc.) and I have so sravnit.boing is a machine to fly, we also av.prom its history pytaetsya blind, that it nevoobrazimoe.i or when (this is purely my opinion) with this approach, we not that that did not catch, but not closer to the world's airline giants. − mihasik, 17 years ago, #

Kamerad! Well, why removed "her?" The main thing was made clear - to update the fleet of Russia is necessary to: - eliminate duties on importation of new aviainomarok. - Discouraging the acquisition cost aviasekondhenda. Very common message. All of us - Pax will be immediately comfortable and safe. But the analogy with cars here, sorry, not quite appropriate. This is your, professional - than the "taxi" is more convenient. And for us - Pax, if the city stall VAZ 2110 - itself a smoke on the sidelines. But if you choke on echelon aircraft (no matter what) - Smoking will have our family and friends. Moreover, the B747-400 air bag as it is not very well equipped:) Uncle pilot Caucasian natsionalnosoti opaque alluded to the example of VAZ 2101, that if the service correctly and competently operate -- be at least 30 years of travel and troubles do not know. By the way buddy, I worked in teh.obsluge TRANSAERO and REDWINGS. He told me a lot of cognitive. The quality of the service boards. Including about flying Boeing planes with malfunctioning autopilot on the orders of the "most". For some reason, I think that a Boeing 757 in the 5-hour flight "on their hands", there is little difference in the impressions of the pilot of the Tu-154 on the same route . That's me to the fact that the case to the reference system. And not in the aviation industry. − MoscowMaverick, 16 years ago, #

any aircraft if its service will normally fly quite a long time, and pilots are happy, and Pax happy, and if the airplanes as it is done with us, anyone, even the most feature-rich Boeing or watermelon and not last year. − pro100gamer, 16 years ago, #

it's true not only of the aircraft in Russia has − Gr1f0n, 17 years ago, #

But Russia's not Africa ... − Exelletor, 16 years ago, #

old song on the essentials. Five years ago, it was necessary to allow free entry of new foreign cars. is able and can afford only a few major airlines. and then to prohibit use of different stuff, both domestic and imported. then now, we would fly only the major airlines, new aircraft. Our aviation industry is dead, or rather, he in a coma, but no signs of life. and on the new TU-204 at least where the bounce! I want to fly on new foreign cars. and the crew could decide the issue, and as soon as possible. − poltavtscev, 17 years ago, #

Yes .... I, too, for new foreign cars, and Tu-204 zarekommendovali is not the best hand and the bounce is higher than the same ... So Boeing will give emphasis to accumulate in the new aircraft, and buy good ... the new foreign cars = ))))))), well, or AN-148 or Superjet-100, at least for those pilots are not mothers =)) − Carim, 17 years ago, #

MDA, however! In about Transaero Boeing 747-200. Sat not long ago at arliners.net proglyadyval just Transaero and decided to see how the old planes they are by clicking on the number of on-board aircraft 747-200. So, I saw an old photo was of the same aircraft, which still flies in Transaero. 747-200 previously operated Air New Zealand and the first mention of the aircraft is dated 1987! − 737-300, 17 years ago, #

It Irakliy agree with you, but of that Aeroflot konkurety may even become ridiculous !!!!! Do the same Transaero schas problems vyshi roof, I get at least they have one week at 747th on the failure rate is 20, and they now do not know who their sbagrit! − KIVLAR, 17 years ago, #

so much:) now, and I was thinking the other day that to buy - tickets on board the 737th ... airline Aeroflot-Nord, or tickets to another company ... but at the TU-154:))) alternativka, however:))) − ydjin81, 17 years ago, #

I would have bought a Tu-154 ... Believe me there is more reliable ... I will not say why the order not to create antireklamschinu Norden, whom serve ... − Epsilon63, 16 years ago, #

So create these Airlines Russia ... So what? Air Union is also created to compete with Aeroflot. Result ... Even if all goes well there, what they would fly? Queues at the huge aircraft and new technology do not begin until at least 5 - 10 years. Therefore, competition from Aeroflot and speech can not be. IMHO ... − Ираклий, 17 years ago, #

heard today that the Government of Moscow created a new airline AIRLINES RUSSIA which will include several small airlines including the notorious aviaalyans Air Union. Perhaps this is the "first swallow" in the way of the air carriers under a common beginning and a correspondingly larger airlines will be more financial opportunities for the acquisition and maintenance of new aircraft, as it is with YOUR safety! − KirillS, 17 years ago, #

AS USUAL RUSSIAN maybe .......(((( − daewooo, 17 years ago, #

Interesting videos − Exeletor, 17 years ago, #

blin, indeed perhaps our aircraft margins higher than that of the bourgeois. if Boeing is already 20 years old, then what can we say about the Yak-40, Antonov-24, which already fly to 40 years. we have in Almaty, I still occasionally see flying IL-18. do not even know how many years it now:) − kramor, 17 years ago, #

"It pіzdєts" I think the only way you can make airlines buy new aircraft. + To the entire Chinese creature buying old planes, they put make-up and sold as new only cheaper. 1 wish only to purchase equipment that laser checks on metal sikro Treschev, eto can help ... − Паша (Черновцы, Украина), 17 years ago, #

Not yet seen them fall to thinking of power. − Nikolay_Sukhikh, 17 years ago, #

Yeah ... − Sir-j, 17 years ago, #

Very sad. : ( − Kain, 17 years ago, #

Tu-154B2

Tupolev ANT-6A-4M34FRNA v1.0

IL-86 beta-2

tu-22m3 panel

Mesh water Kapchagai

AN225YT_xp11

Tupolev ANT-6A-4M34FRNA v1.0