EN 124-100 in Arkhangelsk
| Rating: 4.6!
+4
guys, I floor lightly ..
− qip88,
17 years ago,
#
+2
Still interesting. Even better would be either the camera or with a camera, well-supported video.
− -=Maestro=-,
17 years ago,
#
+1
5
It seriously is not serious, but the video is good.
− Intel_Rus,
17 years ago,
#
and who said that it was bad?)
− qip88,
17 years ago,
#
3
Explain: 1. The quality is not better 2. Shaking the camera 3. Otsutvuet focus object in the picture. It is clear that the plane was a large, well so for the fact that he voshol in the frame is adjustable (if konchno filmed not on mobile). if the mobile then score higher - 4-ka
− Борт174,
17 years ago,
#
5
Beautifully
− Anton789,
17 years ago,
#
5
Speak with the breakage SѓR»RµS‚R°R» ... one of the cars entered in the discharge ...
− Demоn,
17 years ago,
#
4
lowered the quality. When watching this pepelatsa landed in Arkhangelsk, was very impressed by his relative silence. He hardly heard in comparison with the Tu-134 ... The brain thinks more size, more noise, you expect a roar But no, plavnenko tihonko myagonke almost nezametnenko)))
− Storm,
17 years ago,
#
4
The quality would be better! Vpechetlilo
− Tu134,
17 years ago,
#
Yes lyapnuli there with lights:)))
− elf,
17 years ago,
#
Fellow of my father on this machine flies!
− Summerdream,
17 years ago,
#
5
Haha, his light is not lit))) Poveselilo.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
5
for the quality assessment will not set, because not for that, but the content - kults ... It is a pity that when we Ruslan arrives at school, I prosidel ... author respect and advice for the future: Try to be ready to spottingu usual - hang on his neck a little bag with a camera,%)
− Ту154М 85123,
17 years ago,
#
5
Cool!
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
5
By Figo that quality. Evaluated not quality, and video!
− A.S.K.,
17 years ago,
#
No! Evaluated video, but if kach of R¤R?R“RќRЇ even video.
− HaN,
17 years ago,
#