This IL-96, shows that the winglets are not from the Tu-204 and A-330 + engines PS-90A ... It remains to IL-96.
− Exelletor,
16 years ago,
#
at A330 winglets are small and rather square
− Nonius,
16 years ago,
#
and angle relative to the wing more
− Nonius,
16 years ago,
#
5
Author, that the plane?
− pulkovo2,
16 years ago,
#
5
This is more like IL-96 a / k Aeroflot ... and tu-214th Transaero in SHRM not fly. only the Boeing 737 and 747
− Captain_Black,
16 years ago,
#
and "ball" is not certified for carcasses 204/214??
− Nonius,
16 years ago,
#
And you show me even one photo of the Tu-214 TCO in UUEE =)
− Exelletor,
16 years ago,
#
I'm not talking about TCO, but about 204-e in general. I'm just as in the SHRM was not, there is never any one Tu-204 not seen.
− Nonius,
16 years ago,
#
This is not IL-96, the plane can be seen that the twin-engine, mechanization is not such a big area, and ending on 96-m-fold in 2 more. I would also say that this is 204-st
− Nonius,
16 years ago,
#
This IL-96, I sat in the very last row, so I do not see a second engine.
− VDSky,
16 years ago,
#
So I had to write a description!
− pulkovo2,
16 years ago,
#
Is that so fundamentally? Gluck the opera was, I could not type Cyrillic. Rebooted and all the rules became. What to hang because of this that there:)
− VDSky,
16 years ago,
#
but yes, this 96-second, according to the link for photo
− Nonius,
16 years ago,
#
А вы, человек, храбро скрывающийся под ником "Аноним", в XXI веке чем занимаетесь, позвольте уточнить? Небось в тик-ток целыми днями просиживаете. Ну-ну. Вторую жизнь вам никто не подарит, а первую вы уже в тик-ток спустили.
−
~Anonymous~