...
→ Size: 88 MB
→ Date: 16 years ago (02.10.2009 18:31)
→ Author: VDSky
→ Uploaded by: VDSky (uploaded 67 files )
→ Approved by moderator: omega
→ License: Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded: 135 time(s)
+2
IL96 armaviaEK, 16 years ago, #
+1
 5 
This IL-96, shows that the winglets are not from the Tu-204 and A-330 + engines PS-90A ... It remains to IL-96. Exelletor, 16 years ago, #
at A330 winglets are small and rather square Nonius, 16 years ago, #
and angle relative to the wing more Nonius, 16 years ago, #
 5 
Author, that the plane? pulkovo2, 16 years ago, #
 5 
This is more like IL-96 a / k Aeroflot ... and tu-214th Transaero in SHRM not fly. only the Boeing 737 and 747 Captain_Black, 16 years ago, #
and "ball" is not certified for carcasses 204/214?? Nonius, 16 years ago, #
And you show me even one photo of the Tu-214 TCO in UUEE =) Exelletor, 16 years ago, #
I'm not talking about TCO, but about 204-e in general. I'm just as in the SHRM was not, there is never any one Tu-204 not seen. Nonius, 16 years ago, #
This Tu-214 transaero? Ivan777, 16 years ago, #
-2
 5 
This is not IL-96, the plane can be seen that the twin-engine, mechanization is not such a big area, and ending on 96-m-fold in 2 more. I would also say that this is 204-st Nonius, 16 years ago, #
-1
can A330? aiRoNe, 16 years ago, #
-1
Nc-90A engines, winglets orange, there is no doubt that the Tu-214 trances! Ivan777, 16 years ago, #
The first time I heard that on the A330 set PS-90 ))))) Nonius, 16 years ago, #
Rashnu tuning xD KirillDIK, 16 years ago, #
+1
IL-96! VDSky, 16 years ago, #
+1
But really 96y! compare, for example, with this photo http://www.airliners.net/photo​/Aeroflot---Russian/Ilyushin-I​l-96-300/0882992/M/ KirillDIK, 16 years ago, #
This IL-96, I sat in the very last row, so I do not see a second engine. VDSky, 16 years ago, #
So I had to write a description! pulkovo2, 16 years ago, #
Is that so fundamentally? Gluck the opera was, I could not type Cyrillic. Rebooted and all the rules became. What to hang because of this that there:) VDSky, 16 years ago, #
but yes, this 96-second, according to the link for photo Nonius, 16 years ago, #