It is devoted RA-86070
| Rating: 3.5!
4
impressions are good, but the video does not hold, it would not be fair to put 5, so 4
− AFL336,
15 years ago,
#
5
Without words!
− xplan96,
15 years ago,
#
5
fellow
− Grixa_95,
15 years ago,
#
5
and I liked it!
− edgar666,
15 years ago,
#
4
-
− serg09,
15 years ago,
#
3
Satisfactorily
− Jondo,
15 years ago,
#
2
Angle from nothing, a little FPS, piloting somehow not very much, music is not the topic, IMHO
− HaN,
15 years ago,
#
Again, a pancake, well being pilotirovanie.Vy fact know how to read the section.
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
I have not reduced the assessment for piloting;) yes piloting in this section is not quite right, but still, even if it is elegant, but horrible video can still be 1. I have written, in order that would man-mb realized their mistake:))
− HaN,
15 years ago,
#
I understand thanks for your reply.
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
5
For plane! To start winning fps
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
2
Installation of bad camera angles sometimes disgusting, music is not very suitable, IMHO, and idea-it's good, but the implementation ...
− gogonam,
15 years ago,
#
Of course Wang is netvoi shedevry.No could support the guy because he has experience that is not enough. Learn some more, I'm in the creation of commercials, too stupid, but flying can give odds, I mean Fri
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
2
Clip alas no.
− bossound,
15 years ago,
#
But you skazhte why nekakoy.Nu okay Ivan he was an expert rolikah.A you. From gogonamom, of course not argue, but you justify.
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
As a professional in video editing (13 video clips and more than 200 programs on different television channels in Russia and CIS as a director video editing) will tell why the 2 but do not count. The idea is good, but it is only an idea, but implementation is zero. boring video, poorly selected music, why twitching picture and a tight assembly, ie the lack of development dynamics in montazhe.Eto I Lenten describe your mistakes. As an example of excellent speakers will give their utmost installation work as directed by video editing software group Otpetye Moschenniki "Quit 1997 proizvodstva.Smotret here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dePs_U8SG64.
− bossound,
15 years ago,
#
3
Alas, only 3. Such a great airplane, and a mediocre video editing. Jerks, obscure joints, the general plan is glued to the general plan, while the Cuckoo this plane there are many fine details. Stylized old movies too I think out of place here. This is not a reconstruction of the first flight of the first board of IL-86 "Generally, if it were not for IL-86 in the frame would have slapped a two. It might even pick up the sky over a characteristic. Comp as I understand, too, does not pull on the frame rate.
− Orion2,
15 years ago,
#
Guys, well, where does komp.Pust though on the site, our air live.
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
This is not pastiche old movies. Wind and rain had such an effect.
− Jawadrug,
15 years ago,
#
+1
Do not turn the site into "Classmates", where at any photos put five. Rollers should be done on quality.
− Orion2,
15 years ago,
#
If you think so just do not put otsenku.Delo, not etom.Ya when he made his first movie, the guys supported me, although blemishes was kucha.I, then you what classmates have in mind?
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
Acman, not to assess? That you should not make an assessment as to read the rules for you: "have decided to support the writers. Just write good words without evaluation in this case." And he just did right places.
− TaPo4eG,
15 years ago,
#
I honestly do not put otsenok.Za that we put the assessment and to whom? Those people who for all of us try to? And poprederzhite imotsii, and then a walk in the yard may not be enough energy.
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
This is not kindergarten, I have not insulted anyone, and point out the obvious flaws videos. Rating count contains the digits from 1 to 5, so I can raise an assessment, which shows that the quality of work and my attitude to it.
− Orion2,
15 years ago,
#
5
I think it pyat.Molodets! I IL-86, all I adore, as well as all the planes.
− Acman,
15 years ago,
#
Thank you
− Jawadrug,
15 years ago,
#
-1
1
1.Muzyka. 2.Rakursy. 3.FPS. 4.Pilotirovanie ... 5-3 = 2, paragraph 4, I had not considered, maybe, not the section.
− TaPo4eG,
15 years ago,
#
Well, that piloting. Well, there is no reserve on the angle of attack, so added to the neighbor.
− Jawadrug,
15 years ago,
#