Su-15
| Rating: 5!
Sorry that no assessment can be a bit not in the subject, BUT! That is located on the territory Khodynka (I saw the photo there), can no longer be called a "pride" and the more "power". Quoting again there was a 5 and 8 years ago and saw only a worsening of the situation so that "name-calling" Central Airport (museum?) Capital! And in some distant year, even the article was in "Wings of Motherland" that are collected open (like a loud sound!): National (!) AEROSPACE (!) Museum (!!!) RF (On !!!!) in Khodynka. Even plan diagram drawn! And where is everything? Ps The fact that now we can see there (standing) - so it "breaks" amateur radio model (honestly, charms, especially the price of some craft!) And the rest, Take Monino! There, more positive. (Please do not consider for advertising, but this site has a photo made by me last summer. Nice view!)
− Смотрящий,
16 years ago,
#
A ssylochku can? )))
− Ravnmm,
16 years ago,
#
to supervisor, do not forget which country, in Russia, there's promise on TV or in newspapers rarely comes true, it all comes down to the fact that the Bubble on these promises are not made. The money is there, but there is another.
− Heinkel,
16 years ago,
#
5
Thank you!
− Ravnmm,
16 years ago,
#
5
Thank you
− Karadag,
16 years ago,
#
hmm - and what might su15? boenh shoot down is simple enough ...
− davidbrayn,
16 years ago,
#
http://www.kp.ru/daily/23104/22963/
− davidbrayn,
16 years ago,
#
I think dimanok said in a general sense, because the power in the wrong and who gets knocked down, but the fact that this aircraft was built in our power, our aeronautical and we can be proud of this piece of Soviet thought. After all, you will not condemn the Kalashnikov for the fact that he designed the AK-47, which killed hundreds of ... or the designers of the atomic bomb? I think stupid ... Even with chopsticks can kill .. but you will not be cursing their creators, of course not. So do not take individual moments from the fate of Su-15, and put the power of his doubt. Every Soviet aircraft, whether tupolevets, whether dry, whether Yakovlev worthy of honor, it's history, our history and our achievements with you power.
− Ravnmm,
16 years ago,
#
What power? read books ... power was from 1944 to 1950 ... all ... All the while, we catch up! had excellent fishing rod but they were smaller. pilots flew less, etc. .. but that deals specifically su15-etobyla transitional time plug in which the limit is half the Aeroplane Flight Manual
− davidbrayn,
16 years ago,
#
And remember Paul Alexandrovich Solovyov, Gleb Yevgen'yevich Lozino-Lozinski? MiG-25, MiG-31, it is something you said about anything? =) I think is not worth talking about, I certainly agree with you, we have largely lagged behind, but not in small surpassed yet.
− Ravnmm,
16 years ago,
#
of moments of subtle and RTO in another discussion ... - Now it comes to pure PVOshnom plane and its power forward to the next set of mutually exclusive sentences
− davidbrayn,
16 years ago,
#
You simply by virtue of your spontaneity, or any domestic non-recognition of this aircraft type and will interfere in this subject, I propose to close it, because she could not shine a good, just chatter, I honestly had enough. And as they say every man to his own taste, can and banal statement, but it explains everything, everyone has his opinion, I have no right to impose, etc. Similarly, and with your hand)
− Ravnmm,
16 years ago,
#