Family Tupolevs.
| Rating: 5!
Andrew Razbash tell about the family Tupolev passenger planes.
→ Size:
106 MB
→ Date:
16 years ago (22.12.2009 03:03)
→ Author:
Телекомпания "Вид", Крылья Медиа.
→ Approved by moderator:
SLAVJAN
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded:
2345 time(s)
+10
5
S…RђS‡Sѓ 204-th to 9-ku
− basket,
16 years ago,
#
+1
and 214 ...
− qip88,
16 years ago,
#
-1
And the 10-weave!
− wegass,
16 years ago,
#
Give 204/214 at 10ku!
− LainerRRW,
16 years ago,
#
+8
That's interesting. If we are all so good, why then all the way in hu ..??
− susanin,
16 years ago,
#
Well this is elementary. It's one thing to do, and another thing to sell, provide support throughout the world, including, crew training, repairs and much, much more. Everything in this world is covered with the brands, monopolies, government regulatory and support their own economy and protect its market. These systems were formed long ago when we still had the USSR and the private market, and its own closed economy. Now try to go out to these markets-whether you have at least seven genius.
− isc,
16 years ago,
#
Again, again, sorry ... And Embraer as the same? Both the U.S. and Canada, not talking about Europe - willingly take them, but because years ago there were so 10.12 Boeing, but Airbus ...
− 379,
16 years ago,
#
+5
Again all elementary. Parallel development of the airplane company was established all the necessary and working for 5 + world infrastructure. We Tupolev and a Ilyushinskih factories and design bureaus such things happen. Want repaired fly to Moscow, need some! A part-week wait. There is no mass, there is no demand, there is no built a marketing and project management. Everywhere one-time deal, and why? Do not let the government is not lobbying for their interests at the global level, and this is not so simple. Not only the money and desire. Need a constant, daily work with the support of the same State.
− isc,
16 years ago,
#
-1
Our aviation industry could save only the total sale. Because gosudastvu do not need it, and if it is not done now, then and only then will sell nchego
− Arvid,
16 years ago,
#
Who?? And for what??
− susanin,
16 years ago,
#
Private investors, with foreign capital and foreign companies on the basis of joint ventures and private joint-stock company with shares goskapitala.
− isc,
16 years ago,
#
+1
5
We have everything, but buy the import, but still used, paradox)
− Simpsn,
16 years ago,
#
+1
5
By Go on all the issues!!
− whyayeman,
16 years ago,
#
5
why this program was the first pohereli.ona unwelcome to the government?. or tell the truth, that we have all the bad forces are not enough?
− KAI-KSTU-NRU,
14 years ago,
#
program was, kind of like the artist and the author died in 2006
− Pucher,
14 years ago,
#
5
Classroom peredacha.Ne tell that the music at 17:45 (which mean the 114)?
− Gray_Cardinal,
16 years ago,
#
5
Umochka course was Razbash.Rano left zhal.Ego reports have used to influence the current situation in the domestic aviatsii.Sozdaetsya impression that those who now have "steering" kakby it in softer, pests that whether or fools ... And Five of the movie
− aleksis2111,
16 years ago,
#
5
Classroom channel! thanks)
− Striker_912,
16 years ago,
#
5
Interesting video
− sanechek,
16 years ago,
#
5
Good video, but the feeling that we simply endorphin ourselves that our aircraft better than imports. 334 never went into operation, as well as 204 and its modification, as compared with 757 operating
− Arvid,
16 years ago,
#
5
It is a pity that the family Tu-204/214/234/334 never driven as it should. Especially sad for the Tu-334, very nice and the desired plane. It would be better to develop it than it's a misunderstanding - SSJ.
− maxgalkov,
16 years ago,
#
Deals Sukhoi SSJ. And here Tupolev Design Bureau?
− Ant0n1o,
16 years ago,
#
+3
Yes, everything in fact! (Right now calling the reader's anger chuvsto) It would be better, there was no SSJ - he nafig, God forgive me, do not. And if all in vain spent on SSJ kolosalnye money was once spent on customization and more on Tu-214/234/334 - prices they would not. And all would have been in chocolate. And Russia, as a country, and Russia's aviation industry and others, too. And so, until that country, and the aviation industry, and others too, to complete the hole. And SSJ, you'll see, Aircompanies gift will not need ...
− maxgalkov,
16 years ago,
#
Your 214/234/334 outdated long ago
− Jethawk,
16 years ago,
#
Well, not older than the A321 - that's for sure ... And I was lucky: 6 hours spent this summer in granddaughter (flight delay), but then instead of 154 gave 204 - everything is resentment vanished, although 154 to me - just as all the softer will be ...
− 379,
16 years ago,
#
Agree. Nah do a new project SSJ, when cheaper and from the standpoint of the economy correctly bring to mind a more ready-to-operate products Tu-204/214/234/334.
− Anatoliy,
16 years ago,
#
To Jethawk: Firstly not mine, but yours. And they do not become obsolete. Tu-214/234/334 almost the same with A318/319/320/321 (the difference a + -3 years). Model series poslostyu interchanged. Tactical and technical and economic indicators are not worse, but something even better. Yes, it is inferior to comfort, but it is - legkoispravimaya garbage. And nothing more is not worse. By investing in their fine-tuning and a certain amount of modernization funds were left to SSJ, now we have an almost new aircraft type Tu-214/234/334 NG. Catch the difference ...? And again I repeat, would have been all in chocolate.
− maxgalkov,
16 years ago,
#
+2
maxgalkov, the case say. 1.
− qip88,
16 years ago,
#
-1
Brad did not bring it here, I beg
− Jethawk,
16 years ago,
#
Jethawk, Explain please, why this crap?
− maxgalkov,
16 years ago,
#
You first look at the characteristics and what the A320. Then write that there is something not good and even better.
− Jethawk,
16 years ago,
#
Jethawk, I am with you not at war, so that you prodded me here. Regards to the characteristics of all aircraft above title, I know them very well, because it is related to my future education. And in your knowledge of these aircraft, I doubt it ... Would have put the argument, the figure was used as argument, and so empty TREPOV, and only, to which I simply will not respond. Good luck!
− maxgalkov,
16 years ago,
#
So you're a schoolboy. Sorry, you are a schoolboy, first go, and then "Cover" education.
− Jethawk,
16 years ago,
#
+1
Jethawk. No, I'm not a schoolboy for two years as. I study at College of specialized. Your age, I do not hide, unlike some, because it is not always a sign of knowledge - the person may be 58 years old, and in the air can not understand nifigushechki (and not only in the aviation industry ...) and the phrase type "does not bring the delirium I beg, "" so you're a schoolboy, and t d - empty TREPOV!
− maxgalkov,
16 years ago,
#
-1
Not far away, just enough for the secondary. And speaking about their knowledge of whether modest, some there for the future of me personally, nothing speaks generally.
− Jethawk,
16 years ago,
#
5
And then:)
− AlexiZ,
16 years ago,
#
+1
All greetings. In general, navernika samlet not bad, though never flew on it. But I think we are far from evroppopizirovannyh standards.
− A-320,
16 years ago,
#