4 for the model and on the comparison with the IL-76, this craft is definitely less beautiful for me not much like our sturdy
− SimObjekts,
16 years ago,
#
4
2q good, but no 3D (that's if he still has the wheels on the ground were, and not hung in the air ...
− Petr57,
16 years ago,
#
Indeed aircraft srashny to view. They've got no concept of aesthetics. But by 3-D model for Sim nothing to do with what he did with the fact that there is.
− Петр,
16 years ago,
#
To us in Izhevsk often looked for the rotation of U.S. inspection at the Votkinsk factory. By the way more often than IL-76. Therefore Izhevchan usual craft. One question, and the MFS-2004 will?
− bisley,
16 years ago,
#
Sorry, but this abnormality can not be compared with the beauty of the IL-76 to the same is more similar to the Il-76MF in size, and very good transport worker class "medium for rapid", I mean delivery.
− @ntuan,
16 years ago,
#
* Pat was *> "Excuse me, but this deformity can not be compared with the beauty of the IL-76": DDDDDDDDD
− TaPo4eG,
16 years ago,
#
Under the table DAK under the table. To me, our IL-76 more like it with its smooth linyami and curves than this pendosovskaya sausage. that looks like something ugly and flimsy, as if painted her 3 yrs boy, I have these engines in his childhood drawing, from which protruded such nonsense, as here.))) meanness, and not a plane. Let him and good, but it looks like UG.
− @ntuan,
16 years ago,
#
Well, if you fly in Sim beauty, please download the plane pink, with all sorts of gadgets and glamorous fashion;)
− TaPo4eG,
16 years ago,
#
А вы, человек, храбро скрывающийся под ником "Аноним", в XXI веке чем занимаетесь, позвольте уточнить? Небось в тик-ток целыми днями просиживаете. Ну-ну. Вторую жизнь вам никто не подарит, а первую вы уже в тик-ток спустили.
−
~Anonymous~