Yakovlev Yak-40
| Rating: 2.7!
I tried to do at once so that all (well, or at least someone) to please. There are 3 options, you can all see them on screen. Who is appreciated - stavte. There are options with the standard inscription MFSX, frame, shadow, the second option simply with the standard inscription MFSX, but the third one with my inscription MFSX, frame, shadow. In general, choose at least some yes there is.
→ Size:
1 MB
→ Date:
16 years ago (05.07.2010 15:12)
→ Author:
Airbus350
→ Approved by moderator:
SLAVJAN
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded:
350 time(s)
+2
2
Aspect Ratio 4:3 normal display. If someone installs this splash, we would notice cannot. And if not noticed, it means that no one makes! Your work in vain. Maybe not worth continuing? About the quality of the already said.
− susanin,
16 years ago,
#
You are still using old monitors? Most have long been 16:9 4:3 at all dead end. It is ergonomically disgusting. Visual perception in width is much greater than the height. Therefore, a 16:9 image more pleasing to the eye, and that is why all the movies currently in theaters are shirokofrmatnye precisely because 16:9 is now the format for which piling manufacturers of monitors and televisions.
− tserg,
16 years ago,
#
Yes. forgot to add. 4:3 at the moment is not "normal" format, and outdated.
− tserg,
16 years ago,
#
I repeat again, who needs one remake. If anyone is something that is not like it - please. zastovlyayu is not set. and I absolutely give a damn about that two intelligent so hard to convert if they wanted. I have laid out - please. and in general. Create a branch about monitors and have fun. is not a description of my monitor and not a discussion of the like. a flood can do anything.
− Airbus350,
16 years ago,
#
Well, a laptop, for example, 3:2 (1200/800)
− Alvol,
16 years ago,
#
+1
tserg. Most just still use 4:3. Like the majority still look CRT TVs. And you vryat I believe, but most do not have a computer. And as for movies will tell you, they have always been wide. In cinemas screens have always been broad. And if the movie is clipped at the TV screen, he had called, a television film. Never thought why such a program now goes to 4:3? Answer. Because the majority of 4:3.
− susanin,
16 years ago,
#
Airbus350, the best score file is downloaded it many times. This is the main indicator of usefulness to your work. For comparison, look here http://www.avsim.su/f/fs2004-zastavki-splash-screens-47/zastavka-dlya-lyubiteley-dalney-aviacii-v-fs2004-tu-95k-10499.html
− susanin,
16 years ago,
#
+1
2
Quality not so good.
− 080894,
16 years ago,
#
Well, what is ..
− Airbus350,
16 years ago,
#
just had to find a better picture. And the future is better not to lay out screens with such quality.
− 080894,
16 years ago,
#
Well liked this photo just now and decided to do.
− Airbus350,
16 years ago,
#
3
Overall, not bad, but I think that the people evaluating your work, should see your skill, the ability to do something extraordinary, some spice, something there .. but here there is no such, alas .. no offense
− Vladimir_76,
16 years ago,
#
1
Listen to what you are all doing? For a start would be better to take lessons on work in *** any graphics editor.
− Rulez,
16 years ago,
#
4
If you compare with other illuminations, which recently received five, it is not so bad. Although the composition solution, perhaps not too expressive. Perhaps would be better if the logo to make the entire width of the frame, and the aircraft to place a little higher ...
− Karadag,
16 years ago,
#
here are some photos there. if I do something tomorrow .. if something sensible will then lay out. today made somewhere 5-6 screensavers and more laid (2-3) and 3 deleted
− Airbus350,
16 years ago,
#
3
With flowers of friendship is more, now it is a sense of proportion. See you when the bottom of the inscription written above what that empty space was formed, there is no balance. Take: 3.
− Orion2,
16 years ago,
#
-3
4
nice screen
− makhotaroman,
16 years ago,
#
-6
2
money !!!!!!
− Zorgair,
16 years ago,
#
wow how in minutes rounded up. cool. although none Comment
− Airbus350,
16 years ago,
#
-7
3
.
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
Here loonies had multiplied? Either one kook with multiple accounts cons ponastavil??
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
Another cormorant.
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
serg09, disadvantages in principle for the fact that the assessment without argument. Comment on its assessment is not required, but seemed to be on avsime made to explain what score, especially if it is not "5". So the cons quite expected.
− Pucher,
16 years ago,
#
Pucher, it is not my problem, if there are blind people who do not understand, why is this assessment. And as for the explanation ... It's all been said.
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
+1
Make no mistake, that is worth 3: we have already seen an incredible number of splash, which take some pictures together to make a nice screen from the sim, because do not know how (I must assume), I have these pieces 20 a day and can curve had even This splash is seen that the resolution is not at all! The plane in the wrong perspective and his position is not quite accurate, especially for the splash, imho. The quality of the photo is poor, and the inscription, which has frames, the error is still not in the right place, nor colors splash its "originality." The work anyhow, no labor, in general, drugs with a splash continues.
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
serg09, let me then on the drum for you in three ways slapped :-) I basically refrained from evaluation, as do not see the point vykladyvanii site pictures with words.
− Pucher,
16 years ago,
#
Pucher, I, too, on the drum, do not I started to put minuses. And about the pictures have your problems.
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
serg09, why do I have any problems? that's funny fellow ....
− Pucher,
16 years ago,
#
Pucher, it is with you something was wrong.
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#