Visibility is minimal. It appears this is not so simply in the x-plane. Form only from the cockpit
→ Size:
45 MB
→ Date:
15 years ago (01.12.2010 05:32)
→ Author:
skyteacher
→ Approved by moderator:
Fireworker
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded:
345 time(s)
5
waiting for sunset on the drive in the same conditions: D
− inv,
15 years ago,
#
Defecate. I then CHS Away did not get)))
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
Away is not a problem, but the height ... In this connection, the idea to try this go around to make watermelon c "flight path angle":)
− inv,
15 years ago,
#
Yes, that's just the same problem at the exchange rate, exchange rate, even here in the heart of virtually - and then the curve. The arrows of the ARC - time after time setting will not work (well may be lucky just once that is). Height should be possible to estimate in DME (if any), time of flight LMM, well, or 2 meters to go )))))
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
Only CSC CAT III (and the corresponding class aircraft equipment), ensures that the arrows in the center, you generally get around the axle. For other CAT blind visits do not and for them there are well-defined height of eye contact, after which further flight is carried out visually. So with the PSC in this instance, everything is fine.
− FireFly,
15 years ago,
#
Yes, everything is clear. This is life. And then a toy:)
− inv,
15 years ago,
#
I'll post answered the question why the bar in the center, and the landing curve. So it should be.
− FireFly,
15 years ago,
#
5
Video is nice, I liked it. But a little stretched. Roller to do Galazov viewers different angles, etc. Podinamichnee.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
Wrote on the fly. In the previous trailer with default Boeing in FSH kind was told that I recorded when the weather is good, and then a repetition included fog and recorded))
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
+1
That's just not necessary to do video through the eyes of the passenger and look somewhere sideways on the CDF, as recently it has become fashionable.
− FireFly,
15 years ago,
#
At exactly. I agree at 100%
− Albert Sl,
15 years ago,
#
You are not ponyalu viewer's eyes. You're a spectator, you're looking movie and you must be wondering how one enthusiastic aviation. No need to look in the side. To make it more diverse.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
Use a different angle, look, the view from the port for example. View from the window passenger. Combined. Then the movie will be dynamic and interesting.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
Well, excuse me. I can not stand the constant change RACUS, especially when they replace shoals flight. Better film any look
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
Viewer's eyes ... I would place the viewer would look there too, where watched as the pilot
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
Despite the fact that I liked the movie, I was bored.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
Stretched really, can then be three times shorter than done.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
And it is unnecessary to discuss, I only said my opinion. Movie should be interesting. And then 2:00 to watch the panel is not high.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
I jump with a parachute and take off some of his colleagues at the camera paratroopers. So, if I turn my head like a normal jump shot with no cameras will succeed in spurts, because you have to look around at the sides, look at the altimeter, and so on. But when filming, I have to take into account the fact that the record will be watching athletes picture should be in the frame, you can fly around the group to find a good angle vobschem off tastefully. I had this in mind that the movie should be done through the eyes of the viewer.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
And yet, I told you not to offend. Do not need a bayonet charge to take approx.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
Here is a sample clip, which is made with talent. Http://www.avsim.su/f/simulyatori-89/verona-34367.html?action=viewonline
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
I watched this video =). And here I thought he was boring, though admit that shot well. Just this author's motives and mine - are different. But when skydiving, I would like to shoot as well)) to the wing and above 1000 is not just jumping. And in the simulator I am interested in only one instrument and look ahead, but not in the form on the wing, and in real life form on the wing as uninteresting. In a clip I wanted to show the exposure parameters of call, which stand for "5" never happened. I always just love to write on the fly - otherwise what's the point of repetition, spinning, until repetition will not be successful?)))
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
Agreed.
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
way as pocheu ikspleyn not fsms
− a.velocity,
15 years ago,
#
5
Well bulknulsya!
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
In short - the rails:))) Just kidding. In fact, well pilotiruete!
− FireFly,
15 years ago,
#
Ah, I thought it would be better. Was not so simply on the joystick. Distracted jumped near above the glide path, and landing a few clumsy. Another good thing that the airplane jumps with the release of the flaps at 38 - bystrovato they are issued, the rate has to fall to 250 does not have time, that's swell. The simulator if you start with one point from the glide path does not napryazhno was. Well it is. Self-criticism. I wanted to do initially before starting the third, but FRAPS has landed in another file begins to write, did not want to stick together
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
5
Credit;) is worth noting that there still is no buffeting and gusting wind
− Albert Sl,
15 years ago,
#
Aha
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
+2
In the fog is usually no wind, otherwise there was mist b)
− Vladimir_76,
15 years ago,
#
Oh yeah? The truth is that right? ;))
− Albert Sl,
15 years ago,
#
True.
− nakin,
15 years ago,
#
Nuno;)))
− Albert Sl,
15 years ago,
#